Reasoning Statement And ArgumentsPage 2

11.

Statement: Should India support all the international policies of USA?

Arguments:

  1. No, many other powerful countries don’t support the same.
  2. Yes, this is the only way to gain USA development funds.
(a)If only Argument 1 is strong.
(b)If only Argument 2 is strong.
(c)If either 1 or 2 is string.
(d)If neither 1 nor 2 is strong.
Answer is: DWord 'only' makes argument 2 vague but argument 1 the example of other countries.Hence, neither 1 nor 2 holds.

12.

Statement: Should the government ban all forms of protests including strikes and processions?

Arguments:

  1. Yes, this is the only way to teach discipline to the employees.
  2. No, government cannot deprive its citizens of their basic rights.
  3. Yes, this is the only way to maximize productivity without disruption of work.
(a)If only Argument 1 is strong.
(b)If only Argument 2 is strong.
(c)If either (1) or (2) is implicit.
(d)If both 1 and 2 are strong.
Answer is: BWord 'only' makes argument 1 and argument 3 Vague. So, argument 2 is strong.

13.

Statement: Should there be a complete ban on celebration of various day in colleges?

Arguments:

  1. No, there is nothing wrong in celebrating the days and enjoying once in a while.
  2. Yes, children are giving more importance to such celebration than the studies.
  3. No, this type of celebration gives opportunity for children to express their feelings.
(a)only Argument 1 is strong.
(b)only Argument 2 is strong.
(c)either 1 or 2 is string.
(d)Arguments 2 and 3 are strong.
Answer is: DArguments 2 and 3 hold strong because at times student pays more attention in celebrating these day which disturb their studies but these days are important also because they provide them with a stage to express their felling about various things and aspects in life.

14.

Statement: Should the Government impose restrictions on access to sensitive information to the journalists to avoid the media hype?

Arguments:

  1. Yes, the media creates hype and publishes distorted information at times.
  2. No, journalists should have an access to all the information as media is the best source to expose the malfunctions in the society
  3. Yes, at times it leads to harassment of those who are affected and alleged to be involved in the crisis
(a)Argument 1 and 4 are strong.
(b)All are strong.
(c)Arguments 2 and 4 are strong.
(d)None of the above.
Answer is: BAll the three arguments are strong because they are giving the correct information are given to journalists.

15.

Statement: Should the Government introduce a system of obtaining bond from students for working in India before sanctioning education loan for higher studies?

Arguments:

  1. No, this is not a workable solution and will obstruct the development of young talent in country.
  2. Yes, this is the only way to ensure use of the talent of our country for the development of the country and not only an individual.
  3. No, this step will be too harsh.
(a)Argument 1 strong.
(b)All are strong.
(c)Arguments 2 strong.
(d)Arguments 2 and 4 are strong.
Answer is: AAs India is democratic country and every person has its right about where he wants to work and singing such bonds does not ensure the correct use of talent of a country. So, argument 1 is strong but argument 2 is weak also argument 3 is a vague and hence weak argument.

16.

Statement: It is necessary that education should be job oriented?

Arguments:

  1. Yes, the aim of education is to prepare persons for earning.
  2. Yes, educated person should stand on his own feet after completion of education.
  3. No, education should be for sake of knowledge only.
  4. No, one may take up agriculture where education is not necessary.
(a)All are strong.
(b)Argument 1 and 2 are strong.
(c)Argument 1 and 4 are strong.
(d)Arguments 2 and 4 are strong.
Answer is: BAfter reading the statement, argument 1 and 2 are strong.

17.

Statement: Should people with educational qualification higher than the optimum requirement be debarred from seeking jobs?

Arguments:

  1. No, it will further aggravate the problem of educated unemployment.
  2. Yes, it creates complexes among employees and affects the work adversely.
  3. No, this goes against the basic rights or individuals.
  4. Yes, this will increase productivity.
(a)Argument 1 and 4 are strong.
(b)All are strong.
(c)Arguments 2 and 4 are strong.
(d)Argument 3 is strong.
Answer is: DOnly argument 3 is strong because this goes against the basic rights as an individual can seek any job if he class the eligibility criteria. Arguments 1, 2 and 4 are vague hence are weak arguments.

18.

Statement: Should all the youngsters below 21 yr of age be disallowed from going to a beer bar?

Arguments:

  1. No, it is not correct to prevent matured youngsters above 18 yr of age who can vote, from having fun.
  2. Yes, the entry fee to such pubs should also be hiked.
  3. No, there is no such curb in Western countries.
  4. Yes, this will help in preventing youngsters from getting into bad company and imbibing bad habits.
(a)Argument 1 and 4 are strong.
(b)Only Argument 2 is strong.
(c)Arguments 2 and 4 are strong.
(d)None of the above.
Answer is: AArgument 1 is strong as it states the genuine reason against the such ban. Also argument 4 is convincing reasons as huge amount of such people which are engaged in bad activities go there, so it may pull them into such activities. Arguments 2 and 3 are weak as they any how does not support the cause.

19.

Statement: Should all the school teachers be debarred from giving private tuitions?

Arguments:

  1. No, the needy students will be deprived of the expertise of these teachers.
  2. Yes, this is an injustice to the unemployed educated people who can earn their living by giving tuitions.
  3. Yes, only then the quality of teaching in schools will improve.
  4. Yes, now salary of these teachers is reasonable.
(a)Argument 1 and 4 are strong.
(b)All are strong.
(c)Arguments 2 and 4 are strong.
(d)None of the above.
Answer is: DAll four statements are weak because either they are vague or they are less important for such cause.

20.

Statement: Is murder better then committing suicide?

Arguments:

  1. Yes, getting those who are responsible for problems, out of way, is better than sacrificing.
  2. No, taking somebody’s life or one’s own life can never be right and there is always a third course to be taken.
(a)If only Argument 2 is strong.
(b)If either 1 or 2 is string.
(c)If neither 1 nor 2 is strong.
(d)If both 1 and 2 are strong.
Answer is: A(a) One should not come himself a criminal by murdering others so as to wipe out person responsible for problem.

Comments

No comment yet.

copyright 2014-2018 This site is powered by sNews | Login